Q.C. Zhang Twistor Configuration Geometry
← All papers twistor 0.09%

An Approximate Closed Form for the Electron Yukawa Coupling: y_e ≈ (1 − 1/(2π)) e^(−4π)

Closed-form expression for the electron Yukawa coupling. The instanton interpretation is falsified; a Fibonacci-chain-determinant reading on the super-flag is offered instead.

Published
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19981497
Key relation
y_e ≈ (1 − 1/(2π)) e^(−4π)

Abstract

We report a numerical coincidence: the electron Yukawa coupling ye=2me/v2.935×106y_e = \sqrt{2}\,m_e/v \approx 2.935 \times 10^{-6} is approximated to 0.09% by

ye    (112π)×e4π  =  2.932×106.y_e \;\approx\; \left(1 - \frac{1}{2\pi}\right) \times e^{-4\pi} \;=\; 2.932 \times 10^{-6}.

The number 4π4\pi in the exponent is close to χ(CP3)×π\chi(\mathbb{CP}^3) \times \pi, where χ(CP3)=4\chi(\mathbb{CP}^3) = 4 is the Euler characteristic of Penrose’s twistor space. This initially suggested an instanton interpretation (degree-4 holomorphic curve on CP3\mathbb{CP}^3). However, explicit computation shows that the standard Gromov–Witten machinery does not produce this formula: the no-insertion genus-0 degree-4 invariant of CP3\mathbb{CP}^3 vanishes (dimension mismatch), and the normal-bundle determinant ratio is 1/8!2.5×1051/8! \approx 2.5 \times 10^{-5} per factor (combined: 1/(8!)26×10101/(8!)^2 \approx 6 \times 10^{-10}), not 11/(2π)1 - 1/(2\pi). We report the numerical match honestly and the falsification of the proposed mechanism equally honestly. A separate geometric structure does connect yey_e to twistor space: the mass sector of the stratified volume functional [Zhang 2026f] uses Fibonacci weights F(2n1)=(1,2,5)F(2n-1) = (1, 2, 5) — realized as fermionic chain determinants on the same super-flag that produces the coupling-constant weights [Zhang 2026h]. The exponential smallness of yey_e is consistent with a clockwork-like suppression from nearest-neighbor locality on the fermionic fiber.

The empirical relation reported here is also reviewed in the companion DAEDALUS review [Zhang 2026 review], where it is classified as a Cabibbo-scenario regularity; in the broader Twistor Configuration Geometry (TCG) framework [Zhang 2026 TCG], the boundary prefactor 11/(2π)1 - 1/(2\pi) appears as postulate P4.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19981497